Why Superhero Movies Are Proving to be WB Pictures' Kryptonite - Opinion Piece

Written by: Lee Fenton & Kevin Moyer

(click here for Why Superhero Movies Are Proving to be WB-Discovery’s Kryptonite Part II)

(click here for Why Superhero Movies Are Proving to be WB Pictures' Kryptonite Part III)

I feel it's time to say something about the Warner Bros. Pictures fiasco.

But before I do that, it's necessary to unpack what the term 'sunk cost fallacy' means. Sunk cost fallacy is when an individual (or organization) believes it is worthwhile to continue pouring funds into an obviously fruitless venture. It's based around the assumption that once you have extended yourself financially it makes sense to invest more - until the project pays off. In business, this is one of the gravest errors a person can make. It's much more advantageous to know when you should 'cut your losses' and move on to a more profitable endeavor.

I believe this is what the exec's at WB Pictures are doing.

They are being very wary of the potential for more losses due to the business model that they've been following for quite some time now. That business model was based around the success of previously established IP and franchises that were majority of them comic book associated. This is a somewhat new development at WB, influenced by the massive influx of superhero films, and in particular the global success of Marvel Studios. But something we must keep in mind is that Warner Bros has long been a rights holder of one of the most influential caped crusaders of our time.

Who is that, you ask?

Batman. That's who.

If this is news to you – then I'm glad to be the one who informs you - that Tim Burton's Batman (1989) was produced by Warner Bros. As was the animated series that ran from the early 90s into the 2000s. WB has been synonymous with all versions of the Dark Knight that have graced TV screens or big screens since they bought the film & television rights in 1969.

Warner Bros. and DC Comics became part of the same conglomerate in 1969, and the studio has since used DC characters to make more than 40 movies and at least 30 television shows, including cartoons.[1] -The New York Times

What is the point of me going over all this in such detail, you might wonder. Well that's because I need an adequate foundation for my argument before I segway into the meat of this two-part opinion piece:

Why Warner Bros Pictures decided to can the Batgirl movie (as well as most of their other planned comic book adaptations).

CONTINUED IN NEXT ARTICLE:

Why Superheroes Are Proving to be WB Pictures' Kryptonite Part II

[1] Superman in Starring Role as DC Studios Unveils Strategy

The yet-to-be-cast “Superman: Legacy” will begin a story that unfolds across at least 10 interconnected movies and TV shows, with Batman, Swamp Thing and others.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/31/business/media/dc-studios-superman.html#:~:text=%E2%80%94%20Part%20II.%E2%80%9D-,Warner%20Bros.,30%20television%20shows%2C%20including%20cartoons.

Prey (Predator Franchise) Review & In-depth Discussion

Written by: Lee Fenton

Prey is a vibrant and invigorating re-entry into the franchise, determined to deliver the heart-pounding excitement that is required of a Predator film. Not only does it succeed in this but it also manages to be a fairly accurate and in-depth look at the Comanche way of life circa 1719.

Directed by Dan Trachtenberg ( nominated for a Directors Guild of America award for Outstanding Directing -First- Feature Film for 10 Cloverfield Lane), Prey was released in 2022 on streaming services (Hulu, Disney+) to positive reviews and an uproarious reaction by audiences worldwide, praised as the greatest entry since the first film and a remarkable accomplishment for casting a huge array of Indigenous actors.

Amber Midthunder plays the lead role in Prey opposite the titular Predator. For a relatively unknown actress, it's quite the undertaking, thankfully Midthunder steals the show - her performance is not just comparable to Schwarzenegger - it has the potential to go down as the greater of the two.

Midthunder gained recent notoriety with her supporting role in FX's television series Legion, with her amazing fight scenes and choreography. From wall kicks, to crescent kicks, to toting a large melee weapon every other episode, her character 'Kerry” is a ferocious force to be reckoned with whenever on screen. Her ability in acting is tested in Prey as well, and she provides emotional depth that draws the viewer into the hardships of a Comanche tribe that's faced with the reality of Colonial peoples encroaching on their villages, and forever changing their way of life.

For everything that is amazing about this film, it pains me to have to admit that there is one major flaw. The CGI is kind of bad.

Specifically the bear that's in it. Not the titular Predator, so don't worry. There I said it, the Predator looks pretty darn awesome, given that this film was not a mega-budget picture. The bear on the other hand... looks quite bad.

But equally as important; any laser blasts, explosions, gore, etc are VERY believable and quite visually stunning. So, in the end it's really only ONE 'asset' that the CGI artists mucked up. That being said it is 'pretty damn butt-ugly' people aren't lying, but thankfully the bear is a rather minor part of the movie. One that does not affect the overall plot. So you don't have to look at the dreadful thing for much of the film's run-time. Which is a blessing! Plus there's a scene with a CGI mountain lion that looks fine. Although the fight with the cougar was barely lit - cause the scene took place during the nighttime, so... Let's carry on, shall we?

The premise that's given in the original Predator (1987) film leads you to believe that you're about to watch Arnold Schwarzenegger mow down some unsuspecting bad guys in the jungle and then kick some extraterrestrial ass. The ET in question not being of the Spielberg variety (Spielberg's magnum opus was still fresh in the public consciousness having come out five years prior) but more akin to the xeno-morphs showcased in Alien by Ridley Scott released in 1979, a decade prior.

The film however goes a very different route and turns the trope of the invincible action-hero on its head when it places the leading muscle man in the role of a horror starlet for the second half of the film. It subverts your expectations and makes the inspired choice to fluidly travel from one genre to the next about midway through; the schlocky action movie turns into a nail-biting thriller, complete with a dread inducing score done by American composer Alan Silvestri.

Although it under-performed upon its release – after some time - and a lot of VHS sales, it became the cult classic we know today, and hailed as one of the greatest action movies of all time, right up there with the likes of Diehard, Terminator, and The Matrix.

There is an important dichotomy to understand between the two films (Prey & Predator) and it is this – that I have been leading up to; franchise-wise we have come full circle now; a Predator movie that has a heroine in the lead role. The new film actually embodies the rather transgressive idea that was at the core of the original.

Let's shake things up a bit and have a hugely intimidating man run for his life, scared and terrified – trying and failing to escape this alien hunter. Maybe he will win in the end, but we'll up the stakes a bunch in the process – ignoring the idea that an action hero is invincible.

But where do you go, with the plot - three decades later, when the franchise is failing from tired reboot, after tired reboot, after tired reboot? You finally let the heroine, you know the one that would stereo-typically have a rather slim chance of survival in a slasher film - use all of her cunning, agility, and prowess - to disembowel that ugly alien's face, once and for all.

That's where you go.

PS: And Amber Midthunder took us there... don't forget that.

Swinging axes on a length of rope.

Like a champ.

_______________

Rating: 9/10

Authentic Well Done BBQ’d Predator, served with a side of organic veg and fry bread.

Extra charge to substitute Pred. meat for fresh venison, or smoked salmon.

After-word by Author: Also make sure to check out the version of the film that has been re-dubbed in Comanche, it's a shame they didn't choose to shoot two different versions – but that would be about double the work. Basically, shooting two films.

We here at welldonemovies.com understand why that was probably out of the question. Still, really great that we have the option to watch the film with Comanche audio (subtitled in English). The plot is nearly the same, but there are some interesting character changes when the native tongue is preserved. Seems more like the original version to me!

PPS: I know Halloween(1978) technically did it first, but come on! We've been waiting for somebody to go-all-Jamie Lee Curtis on the Predator for decades.